Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 1

Descartes - Essay Example Although he decided to doubt everything, at some point the Cartesian method hit  a brick wall. This happens when he himself agrees to settle for an assumption in as far as the existence of God is concerned. He makes an inference by saying that God is infinite and that he cannot conceive a cause by which God is produced, this means that his perception of God is doubtable since he is unable to explain the origin of God (page 117). This explanation does not in any way prove the existence of God. It is probably the weakest argument in his work and which also shows either fear or reluctance on his part to challenge the existence of God. Assuming that he feared to challenge the existence of God, it can be argued that such utterances as to the existence of God may have resulted in severe punishment for him during his time. TheCartesian theory reaches its point of elasticity when Rene Descartes approaches the argument of the existence of God.   The Cartesian theory does not therefore suf fice as an essential school of thought in totality due to the fact that it leaves a rather big loophole to convince the layman and other philosophers how God came into existence. Therefore his view of the existence of God does not satisfy any philosophical urge to explain the existence of God. Philosophy aims to answer questions and set the standards in the way people think and assess situations. Its nature is such that it is critical and rationale. This means that all possible weaknesses have to be nipped in the bud. Positing absolute certainty means that philosophy has to reach an acme beyond which no one can come up with any further argument. Philosophy relies on rational judgment, so any philosophical claim or statement should be critical and based on pure reason and should not lead in circles. Philosophy should have a definite end point, a point which leaves no room for question marks. This is why philosophy must be absolute. However, since it is based on rational judgment, thi s absolute certainty can be difficult to achieve because rational judgment is relative, depending on factors like the environment one grows up in and even the foundations and teachings of one’s faith. It is thus rational to argue that the Cartesian method  does not fully satisfy the philosophical requirements since the existence of God according to this method, though based on rational judgment according to the creator of the theory, leaves many a question unanswered as to the how God came to being, something that even Rene Descartes himself cannot explain satisfactorily. Although the Cartesian method has been criticized by many people, it actually does hold water. It achieved absolute certainty when Rene Descartes argues that he cannot be deceived into thinking that he does not exist, because unless something existed there would be nothing to deceive. This implies that one has to exist so as to be deceived, you cannot deceive that which does not exist. Absolute certainty b ecomes achievable mainly up to the extent of concrete things, those that we can see and touch, but when it comes to abstract matters which are based in thought and ideas, like the existence of God, the answers and explanations put forward in relation to the Cartesian method sometimes do not achieve the threshold required. According to the theory of knowledge by Rene Descartes, natural light or by the light of nature is the clear and distinct perception which emphasizes the nature that has been made by God. Natural light seems like the basis

Imagery and Exceptionalism in New England :: American History Essays

Imagery and Exceptionalism in New England Jonas Clarke, the minister of the Congregational church in Lexington, Massachusetts, entertained guests at his home the evening of April 18, 1775. The two guests that Clarke hosted were seeking a safe haven from British authorities. His guests, Samuel Adams and John Hancock, discussed strategy with Clarke concerning the conflict with Britain as they attempted to keep their location secret from the British. Supposedly, Great Britain planned to capture these two radicals in hopes of terminating the colonial resistance. A messenger on horseback interrupted their meeting, writes Clarke. â€Å"Then came an express in writing stating that eight or nine officers of the king’s troops were seen just before night passing the road toward Lexington, in a musing, contemplative posture, and it was suspected they were out on some evil design.† Adams and Hancock took heed of this advanced warning and escaped Lexington before the redcoats appeared in the town. Clarke knew they woul d be arriving soon, and headed to the village green to help assemble the townspeople for the expected confrontation. As the clock struck 2:00 A.M., the minister helped order the villagers into position. Many on the green were members of his church, and he knew that they were prepared to fight if violence broke out. For weeks, Clarke had groomed his congregation with images of the hardships of their forefathers, and their hopes of a land of freedom, and he was certain that the residents of Lexington would hold fast against the British forces if necessary. After the exchange between the colonists and the redcoats the morning of the nineteenth, seven lay dead on the town square, some of whom were his parishioners. However, Clarke remained positive that this fight was an important one, and that his congregation would continue to support resistance to the British tyranny that now was endemic within the colonies. Jonas Clarke used his sermon as a method of persuasion to garner support for the resistance movement against Great Britain. During his orations, he hoped to invoke a feeling of duty within his congregation. Clarke intended that the sense of duty, in turn, would provoke his listeners to defend America’s rebellion. He used vivid images of the ancient Israelites and the colonists’ ancestors to depict the struggles they encountered in the past. By doing so, Clarke hoped to show his worshippers the exceptionalism of America.

Causes and Effects of Breaking Up Essay

In keeping with my research topic I chose to Wright my cause and effect paper over breaking up. There are many causes why people break up. In everyone life there comes a point and time when they finds one person whom they fall madly in love with. Real life relationships are different what we see in the movies where two people fall in love and go on to live happily ever after. In â€Å"The Real World† rather than â€Å"The Movie World† it is a fact of life that couples do break up, and there are many reasons why. There are many reasons, ranging from cheating to lack of sex to abuse, that make people want to breakup One reason why couples might break up is money or a lack of money. If one person in a relationship is always paying for everything, their partner just might grow tired of it and decide that it is a good reason to separate. For example, a woman who is always giving her boyfriend money for his rent, car note, and other expenses will probably eventually get tired of it and leave him. Growing apart, an instance in which two people just do not feel attraction towards each other anymore is very commonplace, resulting in an end of a relationship. Some couples simply â€Å"fall out of love†. Some people can only stand so much of another person before they grow tired of them. Sometimes a person finds another person besides their boy/girlfriend who they are attracted to. Finding somebody â€Å"better† will end a relationship quickly, and start a new relationship as well. If a person finds someone more attractive than the person they are currently with, they might have to weigh their options and decide that they want to go another direction. Also, breaking up it could be as a result to distance. For example, when I was in high school I met a nice lady friend and we went together for most of that time. As time came and went the both of decided go own ways in choosing colleges. This results in a couple breaking up.

Pitbull Vs Malum Who Are Maluma And Pitbull, And How Did...

Pitbull vs Maluma Who are Maluma and Pitbull, and how did they get into the music industry, how successful are they now? Maluma and Pitbull are two well known artists that share the same genre of music, but also have their differences in other genres of music they play,but have other difference in how they got into the industry. There music is known for the Reggaeton, hip hop and pop. Their musical classification is different to each other. Even though they do share the same genre, they have different inspirations and connotations. Although they bear some minor similarities, the diversity between Maluma and Pitbull are evident , such as their origin, music influence, and their popularity. Juan Luis Londono, also known as Maluma, is a Colombian reggaeton singer with origins from Medellin, Colombia. Cultivating the stage name from the first two letters of his parents’ and sister’s name. On the contrary, Armando Christian Perez baring stage name of Pitbull, is an Americ an rapper with an origin from Miami, Florida. Forging the iconic stage name from the fearsome and notorious breed of dog that are know to fight and never let go. Therefore, demonstrating that they emerge from contrasting backgrounds. In many ways some people may not know about the crime in each distinctive origin. For example, in Colombia the crime rate is high, as they constantly deal with theft and assault on their bus transportation. Their climate is similar to tropical rainforest weather. Miami’s